McDowell was one of several big-name guest stars who participated in the episode. “I had a great time because of my friend Rob,” McDowell told Fangoria. “If it hadn’t been for him, of course, I wouldn’t have gone near it. To be honest with you, I’m used to doing Heroes and Entourage; that’s cutting-edge stuff. [The CSI: Miami team] do a terrific show for what it is, but I wouldn’t want to do another one.”

The episode gave Zombie a chance to try his hand at directing a crime drama instead of his usual horror films. “I believe Rob wanted to show that he can do something besides a horror movie, which he can; he’s a damn good director,” McDowell said. “But unless you actually show it to people, for some reason they can’t connect the dots. He did a fantastic job, and the episode was really good, we had some fun and he let me improvise a bit, which I was amazed at for network television.”

“The writer, Barry O’Brien, was there and he’s a very nice guy, the producers were great and we had a very good crew,” he continued. “I believe it was smart of them to get somebody like Rob to take them out of their comfort zone. Maybe some of the [regular] cast didn’t appreciate that, but it sure worked.”

The honorees are programmes that dealt with thought-provoking issues last year. In the case of “Coupe de Grace”, CSI tackled race and prejudice in the police force. Other winners include freshman Fox series Glee (”Wheels”), ABC’s Private Practice (”Nothing to Fear”) and the Discovery Health documentary Unlocking Autism.

“This year, we were impressed by not only the number of entries received but also by the breadth of subject matters addressed,” said Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Chairman and CEO John Shaffner. “We went to great lengths to select [programmes] that reflect the mission of the Television Academy Honors committee — to highlight the power of television and its ability to initiate important dialogue and ultimately instigate change.”

A full list of recipients can be found on the official Television Academy Honors website.

With CSI in its tenth season, Szmanda has appeared in more than 200 episodes of the series. “What a long, strange trip it’s been,” the actor told Female First. “I know it won’t last forever, so I try to enjoy every moment. Not many shows make it this far, so I feel very fortunate to be part of it.”

“It’s a great show to work on, thanks to an amazing crew, cast and writing staff,” Szmanda continued, adding that he isn’t planning to leave any time soon. “If I wasn’t enjoying myself, I wouldn’t be doing it,” he explained. “Plus, my character’s gradual evolution from lab tech to CSI level three has kept me interested and challenged on a creative level.”

The departure of leading man William Petersen (Gil Grissom) shook things up on the CSI set, but Szmanda said Laurence Fishburne (Dr Ray Langston) was a good addition to the show. “The mood on the set is very good,” he shared. “We are still having fun. We’ve been through a great deal of changes over the last couple seasons, as any show would after 9 years, but we have a job to do and owe it to our fans to give it our all to the very end. Of course, we miss Billy tremendously. When he left, I realized I was on my own, as if my training wheels were taken off my bike.”

“It was kinda scary at first, but I’m getting more used to it every day,” he continued. “It has taken a long time to adjust to his absence, but I feel like we are finally back on track. While no one will ever replace Billy, Laurence has been a great addition to the cast. He is gracious, kind, funny and professional – which is exactly what we need. And having Jorja Fox [Sara Sidle] back has been awesome.”

The actor’s favorite episode marked an important turning point for his character. “‘Who Shot Sherlock’ will always be my favorite episode,” Szmanda revealed. “Not only does Greg pass his proficiency test, but he really proves himself as a competent CSI. Plus, the episode is shot beautifully and has a style reminiscent of Clue, which happens to be one of my favorite board games.”

For Szmanda, the chance to see Greg take charge would be a welcome addition to the show. “I’d like to see Greg step into more of an authoritative role,” he said. “I think Greg would make a great boss to someone… anyone.”

Source: Collider.com

“Chicago has always been my kind of town and this film reminds me why,” said Virgil Films & Entertainment president Joe Amodei. “It is a love letter not only to the city itself but the people that live there and in particular the always hopeful Cubs fans. This is much more than a documentary about baseball. It is a film about hope, dedication and the never give up attitude we see in the Cubs faithful. It is a look at what’s best in America. Every Cubs fan and Chicagoan must see this film. It’s about them!”

The CSIs are shocked when evidence indicates the murder of a fourteen-year-old boy is linked to a man who has been in prison for over two years.

Synopsis:

An early morning anonymous 911 call from a payphone alerts the CSIs to the body of a boy dumped in the desert. Doc Robbins determines that the boy likely died four to eight hours before from a blow to the head and discovers blood underneath his fingernails. Nick finds a compass, pocket knife, flashlight and candy bar on the boy, as well as an ID lanyard from East Las Vegas High School, indicating the boy, Will Sutter, was at least fourteen years old. Will’s tearful mother, Rebecca, tells Brass that she didn’t check on Will when she got home from the club where she works the night before. She says Will’s father isn’t in his life, but names two of Will’s friends: Mason Ward and Steve Reppling. Greg and Langston search the house for clues, finding no signs of forced entry, indicating Will left of his own accord. Greg opens his computer and finds recent online activity—the last thing he looked at was an article on tribal coming-of-age rituals. Nick and Sara speak with Will’s two friends, Mason and Steve. Mason, the son of a police officer, tells Nick that Will wasn’t fun anymore—he was still a child, while Mason and Steve were into more “grown up” things, like girls and working out. Steve tells Sara that he last saw Will at school the day before, but Sara senses something is off with the kid—a hunch that is confirmed when he throws up and she smells tequila on him. Hodges tells Catherine he’s identified two fibers from Will’s body: one is from bedding, but the other is from the carpet of a 1970’s green Cadillac, likely from the vehicle’s trunk. Archie goes over Will’s computer and finds the boy was exchanging e-mails with a man named Craig Lifford, a forty-year-old librarian from Henderson. Langston questions Craig, who tells the CSI he met Will on a history forum on the internet. He admits to arranging to meet up with the boy to explore an old mine, but insists the meeting never happened. Langston is skeptical, especially when he notices scratches on Lifford’s wrists.

Wendy throws the CSIs a major curveball when she matches the blood under Will’s fingernails to Simon Rose—a suspect in a case Sara worked who was convicted of murdering his wife Samantha and has been in prison for the last two-and-a-half years. Sara reviews the case with the team, telling them that the police had been out to Simon’s house on several domestic battery calls before his wife was murdered. She’s convinced Simon is guilty, and suspects his legal team of planting the blood on Will. Simon’s attorney, Lynn Stagner, immediately goes to the press, claiming her client was wrongly convicted and that someone with identical DNA must have murdered Simon’s wife. She posits to Brass that one of Simon’s many business enemies might have framed him. Langston goes to the prison to examine Simon Rose and gets a disconcerting “hello” from Nate Haskell via a fellow prisoner. Langston examines Simon, taking note of a cut on his neck. Sara goes to the evidence warehouse and speaks with the guard, George Anderson. George shows her no one has signed the Rose evidence out since the original trial, but Sara stops cold in her tracks when she finds another major clue: a green Cadillac in the parking lot. She asks George who the car belongs to, and is surprised when he answers that it’s his. She gets him to open the trunk and finds a candy wrapper inside like the one found on Will. She arrests George. The guard admits he was on his rounds when he caught Will digging around in the Rose evidence. He startled the boy, who fell and struck his head and died. Afraid the intrusion would jeopardize his job, he put the boy’s body in the trunk of his car and dumped him away from the building, then called 911 to file an anonymous report. Nick and Langston examine the evidence locker, trying to figure out what Will was doing there. Nick finds a piece of paper with the number of the Rose case on it, and an algebra equation on the back. Wondering if Simon Rose’s attorney paid Will off to tamper with the evidence, Catherine questions the boy’s mother about a recent $10,000 deposit into her bank account. She tells Catherine that Will’s father got drunk and won some money—and gave her some of it for child support. When he sobered up and wanted it back, she refused.

Trying to figure out how Will got into the evidence locker, Archie and Nick go over the surveillance videos and see a bloody couch being brought in as evidence. Recalling the bedding fibers on the boy, Nick and Langston head back to the locker and discover the couch covered in fish blood—it was a decoy. The inside was hollowed out so that Will could hide inside while the bloody couch was transported into the evidence locker by officers believing it was covered in human blood. After a call about the couch is traced to the station, Brass talks to Kenneth Ward, Mason’s dad. Kenneth confirms that Mason was visiting him at the office that day, and recognizes the couch as one from his garage. Brass and Kenneth go to Ward’s house to speak to Mason and find him badly beaten on the floor of his room. Mason is taken to the hospital, while Greg and Nick scour his room. Greg finds the algebra homework the piece of paper from the evidence locker was torn from, while Nick discovers the bat used to strike Mason—as well as attorney Lynn Stagner’s card. Brass asks Lynn about the card, and she tells him that Mason came up to her trying to extort five thousand dollars to not claim that she paid Will to sneak into the Rose evidence locker. She gave him two hundred dollars for cab fare and sent him packing. Catherine matches the print on the bat used to strike Mason to prints found on a bong at a vacant home that was set on fire… on Rose Street. Recalling Mason was in his dad’s office using the computer, she posits that he was looking up information about the house on Rose Street because he and Steve had something to do with the fire—and accidentally came up with the number for the Simon Rose case. Noticing an empty bottle of tequila was found at the scene, Sara immediately thinks of Steve Reppling. The CSIs find Steve at the house on Rose Street, having set the house on fire. Sara and Langston rescue the boy, who admits that he and Mason were drinking and smoking up in the house. After the house caught on fire and the police came to get the evidence, the boys went to Will to retrieve it, fearing their prints would incriminate them. Mason looked up the evidence, but got the wrong locker number—and they sent Will in to retrieve it, which ended tragically. When Mason decided to try to extort money from Lynn and profit from Will’s death, Steve angrily attacked him, feeling as though he and Mason had let Will down.

Analysis:

One of the better CSI entries this season, “Neverland” is comprised of a series of missteps that culminates in tragedy. Mason Ward and Steve Reppling get into some typical teenage mischief, and, in an attempt to avoid the consequences, they go to their former friend, Will—whom they’ve abandoned for being too immature but who, ironically, is the only one brave enough to undertake the mission to the evidence locker. Mason mistakenly pulls the number of the wrong case—for Rose the person, rather than the street—and Will is sent in, concealed in a hollowed out couch, to retrieve the incriminating evidence. When Will arrives in his “Trojan sofa,” he doesn’t find the bong he was expecting, but bloody articles from a murder case. And then hapless George comes along and startles Will, causing him to fall to his death. George, afraid Will’s presence and death will cost him his job, makes the decision to conceal the boy’s death by dumping the body elsewhere.

As with any tragedy, there are always vultures circling, waiting to take advantage of it, and in this case the mix up nearly proves profitable for Simon Rose and his shrewd lawyer, Lynn Stagner. Because of Mason’s mix up, Will has the number not of the evidence from the house on Rose Street, but from the Simon Rose murder case, and when Will’s body is found with Rose’s blood underneath his fingernails, his lawyer immediately seizes the opportunity to mount an appeal for her client. It’s an opportunistic moment that any lawyer would likely jump on, but Lynn is painted as pretty cutthroat—if not quite unethical. In an amusing scene, Lynn offers Brass a job as a private investigator, noting that people who work for her are well paid. Brass dismisses the offer as “not so sound ethically.” Still, when Mason tries to extort money from Lynn, she sends him away with (a very generous) cab fare rather than directly using the mix-up in the evidence locker to her advantage. Though, she doesn’t report Mason’s bribe until the boy is in the hospital and her card has been found in his room—a card she gave him because she admired his chutzpah.

Sara worked the Simon Rose case during the investigation and gives the rest of the team background on the case. She’s filling the audience in as well, since the case wasn’t one from a previous episode. A missed opportunity, perhaps, but then, the case and Rose’s guilt is pretty straightforward, and if it had been culled from an old episode, that might have been the focus rather than the plight of Will and his friends. As it is, the Rose case is more or less a red herring—a big one that lights a big fire under the CSI team—but a red herring nonetheless in the fact that other than the mistaken evidence locker number, there is no connection between Will and Simon Rose. As far as red herrings go, though, it’s a clever one—far more inventive than the guy whose prints happen to be on the murder weapon for some completely coincidental reason.

The theme of children growing up too quickly is understandably a frequent one in CSI shows, and Will stands in stark contrast to his former friends Mason and Steve. Mason and Steve dismiss Will as immature because at fourteen he hasn’t developed the same interest in girls and “working out” that the two have. What they really mean is that he doesn’t have an interest in drinking and doing drugs. It is the height of irony that when Mason and Steve get into trouble, it is Will that they turn to—and that he is the only one creative enough to think of a solution, and the only one brave enough to execute it. The episode opens and closes with video footage of Will with his mother on his birthday—he’s overjoyed with a telescope she’s gotten him and declares she’s the “best mom in the world.” Aidan Gould, who portrays Will, has a youthful wisdom to him, and plays his ill-fated character with a genuine earnestness.

Though the pieces of the puzzle don’t get connected until the end of the episode, Sara is immediately onto something being off about Steve Reppling. When she questions the boy, she notices he looks sickly, and she shares a bit about her own past, telling the boy she used to wish their was some potion to make her feel older—and that she discovered there was. Steve proceeds to throw up all over the floor, prompting Sara to observe, “You’re a tequila man, huh, Steve?” Having gone through the foster care system and surviving what most would deem a fairly tragic childhood, Sara has always been one to recognize darkness or damage in children. There’s nothing to indicate Mason and Steve are anything other than rebellious teenagers experimenting with drugs and alcohol because they can—and once they’re in danger of getting caught, suddenly their more responsible (and creative) former friend is the person they turn to in the hopes he can come up with a solution to keep them out of trouble.

Langston is confronted with a bit of more recent past when he drops by the prison to examine Simon Rose. On his way to Rose’s cell, he gets a chilling message from an inmate who tells him that “Nate Haskell says hello.” Fans will recall Haskell as the sadistic serial killer known as the “Dick and Jane Killer” from the two episodes that introduced Langston, “19 Down” and “One to Go”. After inviting Haskell to speak to his WLVU criminal justice class via a video hook-up from prison, Langston helped the CSI team catch Haskell’s protégé, who was emulating his idol with a killing spree of his own. In “One to Go,” Langston paid Haskell a visit in jail, hoping to trick the location of the house on Lake Mead where his protégé was keeping his victims out of Haskell, but the serial killer was several steps ahead of Langston, and didn’t give the professor any useful knowledge. Haskell apparently hasn’t forgotten Langston, though, and I have no doubt that eerie greeting wasn’t just a throwaway line. I suspect we’ll be seeing Bill Irwin’s creepy serial killer before the season is finished.

According to CSI Files sources, “Spring Breakdown” opens with spring break in full swing. Hot young people are partying on every beach and in every club. Paul Arnett is driving women wild at a wet t-shirt contest by the pool at a hotel. Brad Donner is leading two lovely ladies through the hallway of the hotel, heading for some fun. Alexis Wilkes is in a club, tossing back drinks and crowd-surfing. Everybody’s having the time of their lives. By the next morning, however, the party is dead—and so are our three party-goers.

A hotel cabana boy sighs as he looks around at the detritus from the pool party the night before. It’s a huge mess, and he’s stuck cleaning it up. One of the cabanas by the pool is missing its cover. He looks up to see the canvas dangling from the trident of a statue of Poseidon, the Greek god of the sea. The cabana cover isn’t the only thing impaled on Poseidon’s trident—the body of Brad Donner is also skewered on the three-pronged spear.

Elsewhere in Miami, workers in a laundry facility are cleaning sheets from hotels all over the city. One of the workers pauses when she hears a strange sound coming from one of the industrial washing machines. She goes over and looks through the clear window to see what’s being tossed around inside: it’s the body of Alexis Wilkes!

A lifeguard is driving his truck onto the beach, and he swerves in time to avoid hitting a round object in the sand. He gets out of the truck and moves closer to see what it is. The object turns out to be the head of Paul Arnett. He’s buried in the sand up to his neck, and he’s clearly dead.

The team splits up to deal with all three murders, and it’s not long before Dr Loman finds himself very busy in the morgue. Paul Arnett drowned, Alexis Wilkes was hit over the head with a blunt object, and Brad Donner was shot with a flare gun in addition to falling onto the sharp points of the Poseidon statue’s trident. Despite the different methods of murder, the separate investigations reveal a common link: all three victims can be traced back to the hotel where Brad’s body was found.

Please note that the above plot details have not been confirmed by CBS, Alliance Atlantis or Bruckheimer Films, and until such time you should treat this information as you would any other rumour. The above information comes from early script drafts and the details of the episodes are liable to change before the episodes are shown.

“Spring Breakdown” will air April 12 on CBS.

Executive producer Carol Mendelsohn said the Dr Jekyll case will not be solved until the end of season ten, but viewers will get some answers soon. “The audience may see Dr Jekyll before the finale, but not in the context of being Dr Jekyll,” Mendelsohn told TVGuide.com. But who will crack the case? Mendelsohn hints that it won’t be a CSI. “It will be someone that will surprise everyone,” she revealed. “It’s someone we know who has been on the show in more than one episode.”

Source: TVGuide.com. Thanks to Shane from TalkCSI for the heads up.